Team Results

FRIDAY - SECTION A GNOT TRIALS (4-APR-25)

Team 1 - REBECCA KNIGHT Team

Home Table Away Table Pair Datums

Board No vs Team Contract Result Score Contract Result Score Net Score Net Imps Datum NS EW

Board 6 2: VIOLET WOOLLETT Team 5NT N 13 520 3NT S 10 -430 90 3 450 2 1

Board 7 2: VIOLET WOOLLETT Team 3 S 7 -200 3 S 7 200 0 0 -430 6 -6

Board 8 2: VIOLET WOOLLETT Team 2 N 8 110 2 N 8 -110 0 0

Board 9 2: VIOLET WOOLLETT Team 3 N 7 -100 3 N 7 100 0 0 -50 -2 2

Board 10 2: VIOLET WOOLLETT Team 3NT N 10 630 3NT N 9 -600 30 1 620 0 1

Board 11 3: MARGARET ATKINSON Team 4 E 7 150 2 E 8 110 260 6 -110 6 0

Board 12 3: MARGARET ATKINSON Team 3 S 9 140 2 E 9 110 250 6 10 4 3

Board 13 3: MARGARET ATKINSON Team 2NT N 7 -100 2NT N 6 200 100 3 -150 2 2

Board 14 3: MARGARET ATKINSON Team 3NT N 10 430 2NT N 7 50 480 10 290 4 8

Board 15 3: MARGARET ATKINSON Team 3NT N 12 690 4 S 10 -620 70 2 640 2 1

Board 16 4: JUDY TRESILLIAN Team 3 W 6 300 2 S 7 50 350 8 180 3 6

Board 17 4: JUDY TRESILLIAN Team 4 N 10 420 4 N 10 -420 0 0 240 5 -5

Board 18 4: JUDY TRESILLIAN Team 4 N 11 650 5 E 7 -200 450 10 530 3 8

Board 19 4: JUDY TRESILLIAN Team 3NT N 10 430 3 N 9 -110 320 8 330 3 6

Board 20 4: JUDY TRESILLIAN Team 6 N 12 1430 4 N 11 -650 780 13 690 12 1

Board 21 5: RUTH SARGENT Team 3NT W 7 100 2 E 8 110 210 5 -20 3 3

Board 22 5: RUTH SARGENT Team 3 E 11 -150 3 W 10 130 -20 -1 -130 -1 0

Board 23 5: RUTH SARGENT Team 3 S 8 -100 3 W 9 110 10 0

Board 24 5: RUTH SARGENT Team 3 E 7 100 2 E 8 90 190 5 -20 3 2

Board 25 5: RUTH SARGENT Team 4 N 8 -100 2 S 9 -140 -240 -6 30 -4 -3

Board 26 6: PHIL ATKINSON Team 6 S 11 -100 6 S 12 -1430 -1530 -17 670 -13 -13

Board 27 6: PHIL ATKINSON Team 2 N 7 -50 2 N 6 100 50 2 -110 2 0

Board 28 6: PHIL ATKINSON Team 3NT W 10 -430 3 W 10 130 -300 -7 -360 -2 -6

Board 29 6: PHIL ATKINSON Team 4 N 10 620 4 N 9 100 720 12 270 8 9

Board 30 6: PHIL ATKINSON Team 4 N 10 130 6 E 10 -100 30 1 10 3 -3

Total 64 49 17

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Team to show that Pair's performance.

Return to Team Results

		Home Table			Away Table					Pair Datums
Board No	vs Team	Contract	Result	Score	Contract	Result	Score	Net Score	Net Imps	Datum	NS	EW
Board 6	2: VIOLET WOOLLETT Team	5NT N	13	520	3NT S	10	-430	90	3	450	2	1
Board 7	2: VIOLET WOOLLETT Team	3 S	7	-200	3 S	7	200	0	0	-430	6	-6
Board 8	2: VIOLET WOOLLETT Team	2 N	8	110	2 N	8	-110	0	0
Board 9	2: VIOLET WOOLLETT Team	3 N	7	-100	3 N	7	100	0	0	-50	-2	2
Board 10	2: VIOLET WOOLLETT Team	3NT N	10	630	3NT N	9	-600	30	1	620	0	1
Board 11	3: MARGARET ATKINSON Team	4 E	7	150	2 E	8	110	260	6	-110	6	0
Board 12	3: MARGARET ATKINSON Team	3 S	9	140	2 E	9	110	250	6	10	4	3
Board 13	3: MARGARET ATKINSON Team	2NT N	7	-100	2NT N	6	200	100	3	-150	2	2
Board 14	3: MARGARET ATKINSON Team	3NT N	10	430	2NT N	7	50	480	10	290	4	8
Board 15	3: MARGARET ATKINSON Team	3NT N	12	690	4 S	10	-620	70	2	640	2	1
Board 16	4: JUDY TRESILLIAN Team	3 W	6	300	2 S	7	50	350	8	180	3	6
Board 17	4: JUDY TRESILLIAN Team	4 N	10	420	4 N	10	-420	0	0	240	5	-5
Board 18	4: JUDY TRESILLIAN Team	4 N	11	650	5 E	7	-200	450	10	530	3	8
Board 19	4: JUDY TRESILLIAN Team	3NT N	10	430	3 N	9	-110	320	8	330	3	6
Board 20	4: JUDY TRESILLIAN Team	6 N	12	1430	4 N	11	-650	780	13	690	12	1
Board 21	5: RUTH SARGENT Team	3NT W	7	100	2 E	8	110	210	5	-20	3	3
Board 22	5: RUTH SARGENT Team	3 E	11	-150	3 W	10	130	-20	-1	-130	-1	0
Board 23	5: RUTH SARGENT Team	3 S	8	-100	3 W	9	110	10	0
Board 24	5: RUTH SARGENT Team	3 E	7	100	2 E	8	90	190	5	-20	3	2
Board 25	5: RUTH SARGENT Team	4 N	8	-100	2 S	9	-140	-240	-6	30	-4	-3
Board 26	6: PHIL ATKINSON Team	6 S	11	-100	6 S	12	-1430	-1530	-17	670	-13	-13
Board 27	6: PHIL ATKINSON Team	2 N	7	-50	2 N	6	100	50	2	-110	2	0
Board 28	6: PHIL ATKINSON Team	3NT W	10	-430	3 W	10	130	-300	-7	-360	-2	-6
Board 29	6: PHIL ATKINSON Team	4 N	10	620	4 N	9	100	720	12	270	8	9
Board 30	6: PHIL ATKINSON Team	4 N	10	130	6 E	10	-100	30	1	10	3	-3
Total									64		49	17