Team Results

FRIDAY - SECTION A IMP TEAMS (5-NOV-21)

Team 6 - VAL BLACK Team

Home Table Away Table Pair Datums

Board No vs Team Contract Result Score Contract Result Score Net Score Net Imps Datum NS EW

Board 6 1: DEL SMITH Team 4 E 8 200 4 E 9 -100 100 3 60 4 -1

Board 7 1: DEL SMITH Team 2 N 7 -100 3 W 7 -200 -300 -7 130 -6 -2

Board 8 1: DEL SMITH Team 1NT N 8 120 4 S 7 150 270 7 110 0 6

Board 9 1: DEL SMITH Team 5 W 11 -600 5 W 11 600 0 0 -490 -3 3

Board 10 1: DEL SMITH Team 3 E 9 -140 2 S 9 -140 -280 -7 20 -4 -3

Board 11 2: RUTH SARGENT Team 4 E 9 50 3 N 9 -140 -90 -3 80 -1 -2

Board 12 2: RUTH SARGENT Team 1NT N 11 210 3 S 9 -110 100 3 80 4 -1

Board 13 2: RUTH SARGENT Team 6 N 11 -100 4 N 9 100 0 0

Board 14 2: RUTH SARGENT Team 5 S 11 400 1NT S 9 -150 250 6 170 6 1

Board 15 2: RUTH SARGENT Team 2 W 8 -110 1NT N 8 -120 -230 -6 10 -3 -3

Board 16 3: MARGARET MANGOLD Team 1NT W 10 -180 3 S 10 -170 -350 -8 150 -8 -1

Board 17 3: MARGARET MANGOLD Team 3 N 10 170 4 N 10 -420 -250 -6 360 -5 -2

Board 18 3: MARGARET MANGOLD Team 2 E 6 100 2 W 7 -50 50 2 10 3 -1

Board 19 3: MARGARET MANGOLD Team 1 W 7 -80 2 W 7 -100 -180 -5 80 -4 -1

Board 20 3: MARGARET MANGOLD Team 4 N 12 680 4 S 11 -650 30 1 660 1 0

Board 21 4: PHIL ATKINSON Team 3 N 10 170 2 N 8 -110 60 2 130 1 1

Board 22 4: PHIL ATKINSON Team 2 W 12 -230 3 N 8 50 -180 -5 -220 0 -5

Board 23 4: PHIL ATKINSON Team 1 S 6 -100 3 N 7 200 100 3 -120 1 2

Board 24 4: PHIL ATKINSON Team 4 N 8 -100 2 S 9 -140 -240 -6 20 -3 -3

Board 25 4: PHIL ATKINSON Team 3NT W 10 -630 4 W 9 -100 -730 -12 -60 -11 -4

Board 26 5: DIANE WENHAM Team 4 S 9 -100 1NT S 10 -180 -280 -7 10 -3 -5

Board 27 5: DIANE WENHAM Team 2 W 8 -90 PASS N = 0 -90 -3 -70 -1 -2

Board 28 5: DIANE WENHAM Team 2NT N 10 180 2NT N 9 -150 30 1 160 1 0

Board 29 5: DIANE WENHAM Team 6 N 11 -100 6 N 11 100 0 0 150 -6 6

Board 30 5: DIANE WENHAM Team 4 S 7 -150 4 N 8 100 -50 -2 -30 -3 2

Total -49 -40 -15

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Team to show that Pair's performance.

Return to Team Results

		Home Table			Away Table					Pair Datums
Board No	vs Team	Contract	Result	Score	Contract	Result	Score	Net Score	Net Imps	Datum	NS	EW
Board 6	1: DEL SMITH Team	4 E	8	200	4 E	9	-100	100	3	60	4	-1
Board 7	1: DEL SMITH Team	2 N	7	-100	3 W	7	-200	-300	-7	130	-6	-2
Board 8	1: DEL SMITH Team	1NT N	8	120	4 S	7	150	270	7	110	0	6
Board 9	1: DEL SMITH Team	5 W	11	-600	5 W	11	600	0	0	-490	-3	3
Board 10	1: DEL SMITH Team	3 E	9	-140	2 S	9	-140	-280	-7	20	-4	-3
Board 11	2: RUTH SARGENT Team	4 E	9	50	3 N	9	-140	-90	-3	80	-1	-2
Board 12	2: RUTH SARGENT Team	1NT N	11	210	3 S	9	-110	100	3	80	4	-1
Board 13	2: RUTH SARGENT Team	6 N	11	-100	4 N	9	100	0	0
Board 14	2: RUTH SARGENT Team	5 S	11	400	1NT S	9	-150	250	6	170	6	1
Board 15	2: RUTH SARGENT Team	2 W	8	-110	1NT N	8	-120	-230	-6	10	-3	-3
Board 16	3: MARGARET MANGOLD Team	1NT W	10	-180	3 S	10	-170	-350	-8	150	-8	-1
Board 17	3: MARGARET MANGOLD Team	3 N	10	170	4 N	10	-420	-250	-6	360	-5	-2
Board 18	3: MARGARET MANGOLD Team	2 E	6	100	2 W	7	-50	50	2	10	3	-1
Board 19	3: MARGARET MANGOLD Team	1 W	7	-80	2 W	7	-100	-180	-5	80	-4	-1
Board 20	3: MARGARET MANGOLD Team	4 N	12	680	4 S	11	-650	30	1	660	1	0
Board 21	4: PHIL ATKINSON Team	3 N	10	170	2 N	8	-110	60	2	130	1	1
Board 22	4: PHIL ATKINSON Team	2 W	12	-230	3 N	8	50	-180	-5	-220	0	-5
Board 23	4: PHIL ATKINSON Team	1 S	6	-100	3 N	7	200	100	3	-120	1	2
Board 24	4: PHIL ATKINSON Team	4 N	8	-100	2 S	9	-140	-240	-6	20	-3	-3
Board 25	4: PHIL ATKINSON Team	3NT W	10	-630	4 W	9	-100	-730	-12	-60	-11	-4
Board 26	5: DIANE WENHAM Team	4 S	9	-100	1NT S	10	-180	-280	-7	10	-3	-5
Board 27	5: DIANE WENHAM Team	2 W	8	-90	PASS N	=	0	-90	-3	-70	-1	-2
Board 28	5: DIANE WENHAM Team	2NT N	10	180	2NT N	9	-150	30	1	160	1	0
Board 29	5: DIANE WENHAM Team	6 N	11	-100	6 N	11	100	0	0	150	-6	6
Board 30	5: DIANE WENHAM Team	4 S	7	-150	4 N	8	100	-50	-2	-30	-3	2
Total									-49		-40	-15